Feed on
Posts
Comments

A good friend of mine (with a definite sense of humour), sent me the following.  I am sure you will understand that it is written somewhat ‘tongue-in-cheek’, but its value is unmistakeable. So, how to understand the view espoused by the “Federal Vision – Doug Wilson crowd”?  Read the (suggested) Short, Shorter Catechism of Federal Vision.

Q.1  What is faith?

A.  Faith is obedience to the law of the gospel.

Q.2  What is the gospel?

A.  The gospel is God’s law that everyone who believes and obeys Jesus will be saved (if they are faithful)

Q.3  What is the perseverance of the saints?

A.  It is when a person is faithful to the laws in the covenant.

Q.4  What is the covenant?

A. It is God’s unconditional, free promise that if we obey, we will be saved.

Q.5  What is grace?

A.  Grace is a free, unmerited gift that God gives us when we are faithful.

Q.6  Can a person lose his salvation?

A.  No one can lose their salvation unless they are unfaithful to the law of the gospel.

Q.7  What is God’s law?

A.  God’s law is that Jesus died for us and we have to obey Him.

Q.8  What is Justification?

A.  Justification is God declaring  us righteous when we obey the gospel by faith alone, not by works.

Q.9  What is Sanctification?

A.  Sanctification is when we are faithful to God’s gospel.

Q.10  What is repentance?

A.  Repentance?  Never heard of it.

Q.11  What is regeneration?

A.  Regeneration is what happens when a person is baptized.*

* Or as Doug Wilson defines it: “A Christian … is anyone who has been baptized in the name of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit by an authorized representative of the Christian church.”

In response to my previous post, I have had a very spirited debate between myself and a Roman Catholic apologist (off site).  It has been interesting to say the least.  At this point we have responded back and forth many, many times.  It has been quite an experience.  The topic has been a wide-ranging discussion on the place that ‘good works’ has in a sinner’s salvation, or to be even more specific, justification.

After going back and forth in a several-times-a-day exchange, I have been pressed that I should back off my assertion that works have no saving merit in a sinner’s acceptance by God, because, this person said, “Wasn’t I aware that the great differences on this subject between Romanism and Protestantism is all due to a misunderstanding of the terms?”.  In other words, the whole Protestant Reformation was – (I’m not joking about this) – due to the fact that Martin Luther misunderstood the proper definitions of salvation / justification!

So all those papal bulls against the Reformers, all those tens of thousands of martyrs, all the disharmony over the past 450 years is because we Protestants just don’t understand terminology???  Wow.  You would think that someone would have just pulled one of those ignorant Reformers aside and explained that to them.  But that is getting off track.

The argument this Roman Catholic person makes is this:

1. Both Roman Catholics and Protestants agree that faith is absolutely necessary for salvation / justification

2. Both agree that God commands us to do good works.

Therefore … we agree!  Problem solved.  Let’s all put the past behind us and hold hands and walk off into the sunset as best friends.

Oh.  Wait a minute.  It seems it isn’t as simple as that.  There was, you see a little sticking point in our long correspondence.  It was when I brought up the little word that the Reformers made such a big deal of – sola.  Alone.  That changes everything.  On that point there was no yielding whatsoever by my friendly (most of the time, at least) Roman Catholic apologist.

Those ’solas’ were important in the days of the Reformation.  And they are no less so today.  And unless we want to go down as traitors to our Christian heritage, we can never lose them in our theology, and the application of it in our daily lives.

Salvation as proclaimed by the Scriptures Alone, given by Grace alone, appropriated through Faith alone, found in Christ Alone, and all for the glory of God Alone.  Amen.

A recent article published by the Telegraph (see below),  makes reference to the practice of self-flagellation by the late pope, John Paul II.  It is interesting to read the same old defence by Roman Catholics of this practice.  One person wrote me using 1 Cor. 9:27 as a “proof text” for the practice.  But does that text mean that?  Let’s look at it in its context – also looking at the verses just before it.

24 Know ye not that they which run in a race run all, but one receiveth the prize? So run, that ye may obtain.
25 And every man that striveth for the mastery is temperate in all things. Now they do it to obtain a corruptible crown; but we an incorruptible.
26 I therefore so run, not as uncertainly; so fight I, not as one that beateth the air:
27 But I keep under my body, and bring it into subjection: lest that by any means, when I have preached to others, I myself should be a
castaway.

Paul is not speaking of whipping his body, or any other action of self-debasement that will somehow merit him any acceptance with God.  He is speaking of the Christian life using the analogy of an athlete.   While I am no athlete, I have participated in some athletics and have some friends who were and are heavily involved in sports.  Not one I have met would “harm’ their body in any way in order to become better at their sport.  What they do is control (or discipline) their body, in order to win the prize.

And that is exactly what Paul is speaking of here.  A Christian must bring the passions of the flesh under control if he or she is going to run the race well and be useful in the service of the Lord.   Solomon put it well in Proverbs 16:32 – He that is slow to anger is better than the mighty; and he that ruleth his spirit than he that taketh a city”.

It is the “ruling of our spirit” that Paul is speaking of.  In other words, “Who is in control?  Your carnal desires or your spiritual?

* * * * * * * *

Here is the news report…

Pope John Paul II regularly whipped himself with a trouser belt that he kept in his wardrobe and signed a secret document saying that would resign if he became incurably ill, a book published today reveals.

It had long been rumoured that the Polish-born pontiff, who died five years ago, engaged in acts of penance and self-flagellation.

But the practice has now been confirmed by Monsignor Slawomir Oder, the Vatican “postulator” who has the task of reviewing John Paul’s life and preparing a case for him being made a saint.

In the new book, “Why he’s a saint”, Msgr Oder writes: “As members of the Pope’s close entourage heard with their own ears, Karol Wojtyla used to flagellate himself.

“In his wardrobe, in between all his robes, a special trouser belt hung on a coat hanger, which he used as a whip. He always took it with him when he went to Castel Gandolfo (the traditional summer residence of the popes outside Rome).”

In November a Polish nun claimed that when she stayed at Castel Gandolfo she often heard John Paul whipping himself.

“Several times he would put himself through bodily penance,” said Tobiana Sobodka, a nun from the Sacred Heart of Jesus order.

“We would hear it – we were in the next room at Castel Gandolfo. You could hear the sound of the blows when he flagellated himself.”

Self-flagellation is used by some Catholics to remind themselves of the agonies endured by Christ on the cross, in particular members of the controversial organisation Opus Dei.

Rest of article here.

To continue with the topic of prayer and the need for Christians to resolve to pray there is a question that rises up and demands an answer, namely, “Why is it necessary that I must resolve to pray?”

The answer to that is found in ourselves.  We are fallen creatures.  Prior to Adam’s fall, we find there was communion between man and God.  The Genesis account intimates that it was regular, open and sincere.  One of the first effects of sin was to make man want to hide from God.  Adam and Eve did not want to talk with God like they used to.  Right here is possibly the greatest effect of sin on the human race: it not only brought in death and separates us from God, but it causes us not to desire to commune with God which is utterly necessary to have these barriers removed.

This brings me then to one great reason why prayer must be a matter of resolve, and why we must say, like David, “As for me, I will call upon God” (Psalm 55:16).

Why must we be resolved to pray?

Because it is not our natural inclination to pray

There is nothing within our fallen, human nature that inclines us to the spiritual exercise of prayer.  Prayer is pre-eminently a spiritual work.  In Romans 1:9, Paul wrote, “For God is my witness, whom I serve with my spirit in the gospel of his Son, that without ceasing I make mention of you always in my prayers”.

There are many aspects of serving the Lord that can be done in a purely physical, fleshly manner: handing out tracts, witnessing to others, singing hymns and psalms, even preaching.  Admittedly, one can engage in a wide variety of “Christian work” without there being anything spiritual about it.  But prayer is first and foremost a spiritual exercise.  And that is why it is so hard to do!  Because only a regenerated man or woman will have the inclination to pray.

When Adam sinned, he immediately died spiritually.  He was in a moment estranged from the God who created him and with whom, up to that moment had communed together with Him, and delighted to do so.

It is far too common to hear professing Christians lament that they have not been able to pray for long periods of time – several days, even a week or more.  (Even worse is when men of God jest and joke about prayerlessness in themselves or others).  Now what makes this so serious, is that prayer is one of the signs that a soul has been converted.  Many eminent men of God have commented on this point, and I can add nothing more than to say this.  In my years of counseling others and looking back at my own personal experience, that without exception, every failure can be traced back to a lessening or, more often, a total ceasing of the prayer life of the individual.

With so much at stake, praying must not be left to times when you ‘feel like it’.  Most assuredly there are many, many times when Christians do not feel like praying.  And those are the times when prayer is most needful!  Prayer must not be left to an emotional or ritual motive.  If it is, it will be at best sporadic, and your walk with the Lord will be the same; on fire one day, cold and disinterested the next.

Be determined as David was that you will pray and call upon God.  Be resolved to be a man or woman of prayer.  In every situation, for all things and for all people.

Care-less Christians

This week I am preaching from Matthew 6:19-34.  The subject matter of my sermon has to do with being a ‘care-less’ Christian.  Note, I did not say a careless one, but a care-less one.  There is a monumental difference!

When Paul wrote to the Philippians he told them to “Be careful for nothing, but in everything by prayer and supplication let your requests be made known unto God” (Phil. 4:6)

How often we face trials in our Christian life and rather than take the matter to the Lord, we hold on to the burden ourselves, and then start to lose assurance in a sovereign, all-wise, all-loving Father in heaven!  In other words we lose our confidence, and keep our cares.  That is living the Christian life all backwards.  God directs us to live otherwise.

One lesson that I have had to learn more than once is the importance of giving the Lord my cares, and growing in confidence in His sovereign ability to deal with every situation that I face.

Christian, you are to “hold fast the confidence and the rejoicing of the hope firm unto the end” (Hebrews 3:6), and to “(cast) all your cares upon Him, for He careth for you” (1 Peter 5:7).

It is His will that we should cast our cares on Him each day.

He also bids us not to cast our confidence away;

But oh! how foolishly we act when taken unaware,

We cast our confidence away, and carry all our care.

What are you holding on to today?  Your confidence or your cares?  It is the difference between victory and defeat.

The article below should be of concern for every Canadian.   According to its author, Canada was one of the first countries to sign on to the Copenhagen pact.  But what should be of even more concern are these two sentences:

(Quote) Blaney said Canada is working with the United States at establishing a continental cap-and-trade plan, which will set maximum limits on greenhouse emissions by industries, allowing them to sell credits if they are under the limit or buy credits if they are over.

Blaney also said Canada now is focused on the next global climate-change summit in Mexico City in December, when Canada hopes a binding agreement can be achieved.

This is selling out our nation’s sovereignty.  No government possesses the right to do so.  Especially a government that has been duly-elected by its citizens.  And even more especially, a Conservative government made up of many MP’s who first were elected to power as Reform Party candidates and who ran on a very different platform than what they are now proposing for us all.

Perhaps a prayerful reading of Isaiah 59, with particular consideration of verse 16, would be in order.

* * * * * * *

CANADA SIGNS COPENHAGEN PACT – Cuba to opt out

By KEVIN DOUGHERTY, The GazetteJanuary 8, 2010

While Canada and Prime Minister Stephen Harper were criticized for taking a weak position on greenhouse-gas reductions at the recent Copenhagen meeting on climate change, Canada is among the first countries to sign the Copenhagen agreement.

The Bloomberg news agency reported that Australia, Canada, Papua New Guinea and the Maldives were the first to notify the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change of their wish to be associated with the Copenhagen accord.

Under a last-minute deal, ironed out by President Barack Obama along with Brazil, South Africa, India and China, countries wishing to adhere must do so by Jan. 31.

Bloomberg also said Cuba was the only nation so far to say it doesn’t want to be associated with the plan, which calls for keeping the increase in global temperatures below two degrees Celsius.

The plan commits developed economies to provide the developing world $100 billion U.S. by 2020 to help them deal with their greenhouse- gas emissions.

But unlike the previous Kyoto agreement, the Copenhagen accord does not set overall targets for reducing greenhouse gases.

Countries adhering will list their targets in an annex to the December agreement.

Yesterday, Steven Blaney, Conservative MP for Lévis-Bellechasse, confirmed Canada has told the UNFCCC, it is sticking to its target of a 20-per-cent reduction in greenhouse gases by 2020, using a 2006 starting date.

The international benchmark of greenhouse-gas reductions is 1990, and relative to that date, Canada’s target in fact is a three-per-cent reduction.

Blaney said Canada is working with the United States at establishing a continental cap-and-trade plan, which will set maximum limits on greenhouse emissions by industries, allowing them to sell credits if they are under the limit or buy credits if they are over.

Blaney also said Canada now is focused on the next global climate-change summit in Mexico City in December, when Canada hopes a binding agreement can be achieved.

Blaney met reporters to promote the Nemo, an electric delivery vehicle developed and built in his riding, which he says as part of the solution.

The Quebec National Assembly has acquired a Nemo, and Blaney pledged, without making a firm commitment, to encourage the federal government to acquire Nemo delivery vehicles as well.

The following is a  modified version taken from short devotional messages recently given to our congregation at our weekly prayer meetings.  The Lord has seen fit to bless these thoughts and the regular prayer meetings have been enhanced by members asking, and meeting for  additional times of prayer over and above our regular meetings.  My prayer is that the Lord will use these thoughts to stir every believer who reads these words to increase in faith and prayer. (J.E.T.)

We are now a full week into our ‘new year’ of 2010.

Did you make any New Year’s resolutions for this year?  If so, how are you doing in keeping them?  I read somewhere that most resolutions made on Dec 31 are broken by the end of the first week.  That is not a promising statistic!

While the world’s concept of “making resolutions” is not a Christian doctrine, there can be no denying that one aspect of being a Christian is to be a man or woman of resolve.

We are commanded to “examine ourselves” as to whether we are “in the faith” or not.

Prior to participating at the Lord’s table (Communion), it is incumbent for all to go through this self-examining process.  (By the way, it is not to examine yourself to see if you are “good enough” – none of us ever are!  It is primarily to see if you bear the evidence of being a child of God).

This examining of ourselves will inevitably reveal sins that need to be confessed, weaknesses that need to be strengthened, and failures that need to be dealt with.  But it must not stop there.  There must be a resolve by God’s grace to confess those sins, seek His strength to overcome our weaknesses, and faithfully deal with our failures so that we might be good soldiers of Jesus Christ (2 Timothy 2:3).

One of the major failures for most Christians is in the realm of prayer.  It would be almost shocking to hear a truly regenerated child of God say they were satisfied with their prayer life; that they were convinced it was as good as it could be, that there wasn’t much room for improvement, etc.  In fact, just hearing those words would convince us we were listening to someone with a heart of pride.

Do you know that the great saints of Scripture were – without exception – men and women of prayer?  Did you know that the great saints of church history – as far as we know from their diaries, autobiographies and biographies – were men and women of prayer?  Their theologies might have differed, but I do not know of one person who accomplished any lasting work for God who was not given to prayer.

Something else, to read about them is to be impressed that they were resolved to pray.  They knew the difficulty of prayer, and they knew that if they did not make it a matter of fervent resolve and determination, that they would fall into the same miserable condition that so much of the Christian church finds itself in today – a lack of prayer, which inevitably means a lack of power.

King David was a man of prayer.  He was a great sinner, but he was also a great saint.  And, I believe he was a great saint because he was a great ‘Supplicator’.  He knew how to pray.  But that doesn’t mean it came naturally to him.  Prayer is a spiritual work, and “the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit for they are foolishness unto him “(2 Cor. 2:14).  David was a great pray-er, because he determined he would be a man of prayer.  Consider these statements:

Psalm 55:16,17 As for me, I will call upon God; and the Lord shall save me. Evening and morning, and at noon, will I pray, and cry aloud: and he shall hear me.

Psalm 86:7  In the day of my trouble I will call upon thee; for thou wilt answer me.

Psalm 61:2 From the end of the earth will I cry unto thee, when my heart is overwhelmed: lead me to the rock that is higher than I.

These are but a sampling of texts that show us David’s resolve to pray by the language he uses.

The question now is this: Are you willing to make this an area you will resolve to improve?  A more fulfilling prayer life doesn’t “just happen”.  It is difficult work and the opposition to it will come in many forms.  And that is where the matter of resolve comes in.  Are we going to pray through the obstacles and opposition?  Then we must grasp this truth with both hands and not let it go.  But even more than that, this truth must get hold of us.

In my next posting on this topic,  I hope to deal with truths that will assist you in your resolve to pray.  Questions or comments are always welcome.

Here is some financial wisdom put very succinctly.

You cannot legislate the poor into freedom by legislating the industrious out of it. You don’t multiply wealth by dividing it. Government cannot give anything to anybody that it doesn’t first take from somebody else. Whenever somebody receives something without working for it, somebody else has to work for it without receiving. The worst thing that can happen to a nation is for half of the people to get the idea they don’t have to work because somebody else will work for them, and the other half to get the idea that it does no good to work because they don’t get to enjoy the fruit of their labor.

Dr. Adrian Rogers

In this short video clip, well-known evangelist / missionary Paul Washer says it like it is. He is speaking to professing Christians who spend their time on the internet, playing to their vanity on Facebook, and generally wasting their lives.

There can be little doubt that the internet has replaced the TV as the great time-waster for the younger generation. Between video games, net surfing, and the Facebook craze, the computer has rivaled, if not replaced, the television for sheer wastefulness, worldliness and wickedness.

From my own experience with dealing with this issue, I have (generally) found that those who spend inordinate amounts of time ’surfing the net’, and posting their self-idolizing “look at me!” snippets on Facebook often combine the worst of characteristics. They become busybodies in the scriptural sense of the word, gossips, and are influenced by worldly fashion, standards and behaviour, while on the other hand become negligent about their Christian responsibilities as wives, husbands, parents, employees, etc. (See 1 Timothy 5:13)

What Paul Washer states here is worth hearing. Take the 4 minutes and listen. And then may God speak to your heart and apply this to you. Maybe it is something else in your life, (a recreation obsession?) that you are wasting your time and energies on. Whatever it is, remember that as Christians we are to “redeem the time”. Why? Because “the days are evil”.

To paraphrase Washer’s words, “Go out and live for something worth living for, and die for something worth dying for”.

Seeing as the “eyes of the media” are mostly on the nations gathered in Copenhagen this week, I was very interested in receiving this article from the Canadian Taxpayers Federation on the costs to the citizens of Canada.  Truly staggering.  And more reason than ever for Christians to heed the apostle’s exhortation in 1 Timothy 2:1-3 to pray for “kings, and for all that are in authority; that we may continue to lead quiet and peaceable lives in all godliness and honesty.”

CTF – Would you be upset if you knew your government was about to get duped in a con that would cost your family at least $3,000 a year in new taxes? That is exactly what is happening in Copenhagen right now.

The developing world has teamed up with global warming activists in Copenhagen at the world climate conference. Together they are planning the big con. Key to the con is to play on the eco-guilt of the developed world; using it to scam cash from ‘rich countries,’ and transferring it to the developing world; all in the name of ‘ending climate change.’ The Copenhagen grifters are hoping to cash the cheques before the developing world wakes up to the con.

A leaked draft version of the agreement on the table at the Copenhagen climate conference reveals plans for a massive transfer of wealth out of Canada. This transfer will come in the form of new taxes and the establishment of a new world government body for climate change housed in the World Bank.

Lord Christopher Monckton is reported to have obtained a working copy of the draft agreement. He warns that the secretive draft version of the Copenhagen climate change treaty represents a global government power grab on an “unimaginable scale,” and mandates the creation of 700 new bureaucracies as well as a colossal raft of new taxes including 2 per cent levies on GDP and a 2 per cent tax on every international financial transaction.

The draft agreement also reportedly contains a provision for a “uniform global levy of $2 dollars per ton of CO2 for all fossil fuel emissions,” as well as an additional tax on every commercial plane journey, except ones that go in or out of poorer countries.

Of course, in addition to these various taxes, the draft agreement, reportedly pushed by President Obama, the UK and Denmark, would require auctioning of allowances to emit carbon dioxide – a cap and tax scheme. Failing to purchase permits would be met with financial penalties or outright prohibitions against such emissions.

The 2 per cent tax on GDP alone would cost Canada some $26 billion. The $2 a tonne tax would add up to $500 million per year. And the tax on international financial transactions would soak untold billions. This total tax grab is at least $26.5 billion, or over $3,000 a year for every Canadian family – not including the tax on financial transactions or plane trips.

This idea would be bad enough even if the cash was meant to stay in Canada. But it is not. The scheme is designed to send this cash to 49 developing nations for them to reduce their CO2 emissions and to create ‘so-called’ green projects. These 49 countries include the likes of Uganda, Burundi and the Sudan.

There is a perception that taxing CO2 will only hurt Canada’s west. However, CO2 emission data from Environment Canada for 2008 reveals that Alberta won’t be alone to feel the pain. While Alberta would bear 42 per cent of this burden, Ontario would have to pay for 26 per cent, due mainly to its substantial reliance on coal for electricity.  Moreover, while the energy may be produced in Alberta a large percentage of Alberta’s oil and gas is consume in eastern Canada and many of those taxes will be passed along.

Further, imposing a tax on international financial transactions will place new pressures on Canada’s banks, which, so far, have survived sub-prime mortgage challenges and have weathered the global economic storm

Canadian families work too hard to see thousands of their tax dollars go from their pocket to some ‘green’ project in Sudan. The Harper government should save Canadians from this international massive tax grab.

Written by: Kevin Gaudet, Director CTF

Older Posts »

Bad Behavior has blocked 84 access attempts in the last 7 days.